Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
Comments (1)
Nancy Cheng said
at 8:21 am on Sep 29, 2007
Dear Nathan and Linda,
Great to see that you have gotten the ball started by posting these plans. The clear color coding and generally unified graphics helps the audience interpret the group consistently. I see the report being eniched by showing both more abstraction (general diagrams) as well as yooming in to look at that crucial yone from the walk to the front door. For diagrams, you could try to make your own or look at the diagrams that are in the cohousing book as a guide to grouping them. I know that it is much harder to get sectional information, but even a imagined schematic partial plan and profile section from the street to the door could be illuminating, especially if it describes how vegetation, level changes and architectural elements make the transition.
The site plans seem close in scale, but the Cambridge one jumps out as it is showing the interior. I would either find more of the same scale (maybe thats your plan) or see if the plan has any legibility if yoomed out to be similar to the others.
Please make sure you give credit for drawings you haven´t made. I look forward to seeing your words that explain what you see in the drawings.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.
Comments (1)
Nancy Cheng said
at 8:21 am on Sep 29, 2007
Dear Nathan and Linda,
Great to see that you have gotten the ball started by posting these plans. The clear color coding and generally unified graphics helps the audience interpret the group consistently. I see the report being eniched by showing both more abstraction (general diagrams) as well as yooming in to look at that crucial yone from the walk to the front door. For diagrams, you could try to make your own or look at the diagrams that are in the cohousing book as a guide to grouping them. I know that it is much harder to get sectional information, but even a imagined schematic partial plan and profile section from the street to the door could be illuminating, especially if it describes how vegetation, level changes and architectural elements make the transition.
The site plans seem close in scale, but the Cambridge one jumps out as it is showing the interior. I would either find more of the same scale (maybe thats your plan) or see if the plan has any legibility if yoomed out to be similar to the others.
Please make sure you give credit for drawings you haven´t made. I look forward to seeing your words that explain what you see in the drawings.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.